DOJ Not Likely to Reverse Wire Act Opinion - News : News
Published on
Update on

In mid-February, the New Hampshire state lottery filed a lawsuit against the United States Department of Justice new interpretation of the 1961 Wire Act. The complaint was filed to a US District Court for New Hampshire with the Department of Justice and William Barr, the newly appointed Attorney General, as the defendants. According to their lawsuit, the new Wire Act opinion ignores the “clear, binding precedents” on the scope of the law.

Perhaps the biggest issue was that the new opinion caused so much confusion with regards to how strict its implementation would be. This sentiment was shared by many entities and other states including Pennsylvania – they have been participating in the lawsuit in one way or the other. This is quite a big deal since if the opinion whose implementation has been delayed goes is implemented at the moment, all the lotteries across the country will be brought to a grinding halt. This would result in the loss of millions of dollars in revenue for states like New Hampshire and Pennsylvania. There has been a tone of speculation that the move to reinterpret the law was influenced by certain industry leaders who have not been sold on the idea of online gambling.

Despite all that is going on now, a recent move by the United States Department of Justice shows that it is not even considering the reversal of its new opinion. The move which intends to squash the backlash that it has received since it announced that the Wire Act would apply to all other forms of online gambling and not just sports betting.

The Response

The Department of Justice’s response arrived last Friday in a 37-page document that requested that the lawsuit is dismissed – there is, obviously, an extremely slim chance that the request for dismissal will be granted. However, the very fact that the department has opted to request the dismissal of the lawsuit proves that it is indeed not ready to reverse the Wire Act opinion.

To make it even worse, shortly after New Hampshire has already received the amicus briefs to its lawsuit, Sheldon Adelson (the anti-gambling lord himself) through the Coalition to Stop Internet Gambling (CSIG) filed yet another amicus brief supporting the decision of the Department of Justice. While this not surprising at all, it certainly makes it clear that the department is amassing some support as it prepares for the legal battle ahead. All hope is not lost though – there are now a total of 15 states supporting the New Hampshire lawsuit and this probably enough to at least get the DOJ to make a few changes to their opinion.

Latest Headlines

Pennsylvania’s Gaming Revenue Down in FY 2019/20, Online Helps

Pennsylvania has taken a tumble in terms of gambling results in the 2019/20 fiscal year, buoyed up by online gaming as much as possible. The Fiscal Over Finishes on a Low Point for Pennsylvania Pennsylvania is reaping big benefits from its decision to issue iGaming licenses in 2019, yet adoption hasn’t been quick enough. While […]

Pennsylvania and PokerStars PA Post $3.2M Revenue in June

Despite a back-to-back decline in online poker revenue, June has remained much stronger than the first three months of 2020. Pennsylvania Holds Good Poker Results in April Some have predicted a dip in revenue and results, but online poker in Pennsylvania is still doing very well with June’s revenue reaching $3.2 million. In May, though, […]

Mount Airy Stays Afloat Buoyed up by Poker

Mount Airy Casino Resort registers the smallest revenue decline year-over-year The casino is bolstered by Internet poker and gaming operations Sports betting in Pennsylvania begins to climb up and recover in June Out of all 12 state casinos, Mount Airy has proven the most resilient thanks to its partnership with PokerStars and online poker and […]

Partypoker May Soon Join PokerStars PA in Pennsylvania

Partypoker PA is closer to arriving in Pennsylvania, breaking up PokerStars’ monopoly, and opening an alternative cardroom for players from the Keystone State. As one of the leading platforms in the world, partypoker is well-positioned to make a splash, especially under the leadership of GVC Holdings, one of the largest gambling firms in the industry, […]

Players Will Need to Travel to Play in WSOP Online, Negreanu Says

The World Series of Poker (WSOP) Online will host 54 WSOP bracelet events on the GGPoker platform Daniel Negreanu, GGPoker Ambassador, outlines certain changes to the schedule and advises players on how to participate if they play from restricted jurisdictions Micro-stake players will get a chance to qualify for some of the big WSOP events […]

Similar PA Casinos Post

Legal Sports Betting Finally Takes Off in Indiana

Indiana has officially become the 12th US state to legalize sports betting after three of the state’s casinos were inaugurated on September 1 just in time for the forthcoming NFL season. Of the three casinos that debuted their sports betting offerings, one of them was privileged to have been inaugurated by Governor Eric Holcomb who […]

Pa. Gets Serious About Restricting Online Play at Casinos

Online sports betting and online casinos have been a reality in the Keystone State for over a month now and it is every bit as exciting as many of the state’s residents expected it to be. The state’s online gambling sector was among the most anticipated ones in the United States and now that it […]

Pa. Gambling Watchdog Reiterates on Complaint Procedures

As online gambling continues to spread in the Keystone State, the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board (PGCB) has recently seen it fit to remind the state’s residents that they have a place to turn to if they think they were treated unfairly by any of the online gambling operators. On Monday, August 5, the gaming control […]

Lawsuit Against SugarHouse Casino Withdrawn

A lawsuit that was filed against SugarHouse Casino in Philadelphia has recently been withdrawn. According to the court documents, the attorneys of the two claimants who filed the lawsuit notified the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that they had decided to voluntarily dismiss the lawsuit, without prejudice. As such, they […]